![]() ![]() It allows you to pinpoint the exact freq that are causing the problem and make the bandwidth only as wide as necessary and only cut as much as you need. ![]() pulling down a bunch of sliders.Ī parametric EQ can give better results than a graphic. The overall response is 'altered' less by widening the parametric bandwidth vs. The ability to vary the "Q" or width of a notch should be a strong selling point for a parametric on monitors if you find that you adjust adjacent sliders on a graphic to eliminate some offending noise. Once you've passed that point, a parametric is superior to a graphic for certain type of filtering. Parametrics are a little trickier to learn. Hey all, I'm using a 31 band dbx graphic eq into a qsc plx series amp to run our stage monitors.We play mainly smaller bars/restaurants and I was wondering if anyone uses parametric eq's for stage monitors.I'm finding that once I get the volume to a certain point there appears to be a lot more headroom but feedback starts occuring so I can only push them so far.After eliminating the offending frequencies, I can takeit up a little but not that much.Are there benefits to using a parametric eq instead or in conjunction with a graph eq? thanks.MJ MattyJarema wrote on Sun, 11 December 2005 11:08 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |